Psychological Scientists Discuss Language Learning
A recent report by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences concluded that the majority of Americans are monolingual, and that the US needs to increase access to language learning to remain competitive in the global economy. To address these concerns, APS convened a group of psychological scientists, linguists, and others in May in Boston, MA in conjunction with the 2017 APS Annual Convention.
At this meeting, participants discussed future research directions related to this report, and they also planned new public information efforts centered on the importance of language learning. As one outcome of these efforts, psychological scientist Catherine Snow (Harvard University) wrote an article in The Conversation titled, “The True Failure of Foreign Language Instruction,” discussing why language learning in America is so different from what it is in other countries.
“As an expert on language and literacy development in children, I’ve talked to many immigrant parents who expect their children to grow up bilingual, only to be surprised that they end up as monolingual English speakers. Meanwhile, foreign language learning opportunities for English speakers are limited. Why is the U.S. so bad at producing bilinguals?”
Snow points to unrealistic expectations for how language learning works, and poor political and social support for maintaining additional languages, as two reasons for America’s monolingual nature.
The Academy report makes it clear that the US has a long way to go to improve the teaching and learning of languages other than English. Fortunately, psychological science has the capacity to address the social, cognitive, and perceptual issues related to language learning—and the group of scientists meeting at the APS Convention was an important step toward solutions.
APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.
Please login with your APS account to comment.