-
New Content from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
A sample of articles on the effect of gustatory disgust on moral judgment, the improvement of practices for selecting variables, and the effects of studies’ originality and statistical significance on the peer-review process.
-
Strengthening Psychological Science with Specialized Statistical Review
Focused technical assessments by statistical experts could help psychology journals defend against the improper use of statistics.
-
Becoming a Peer Reviewer for NIH: Four Ways to Engage
There are a few simple ways to bring your research expertise and interest in serving as a peer reviewer to the attention of Scientific Review Officers at NIH.
-
The National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) Seeks Quality of Research Reviewers
The National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) is recruiting candidates to become certified reviewers tasked with rating the methodological quality and effectiveness of program evaluations. Funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
-
Taking Responsibility for Our Field’s Reputation
To put it bluntly, academic psychology’s public reputation seems to be in free fall. When the press coverage of the “replicability crisis” in psychological science first began a few years ago, reporters generally broached the
-
‘Hello From the Other Side’ at ICPS 2017: Editors Answer Researchers’ Questions About Publishing Integrative Science
Psychological scientists are increasingly integrating multiple areas of study and levels of analyses into their research, but they face myriad challenges in doing so. Editors from some of the most esteemed journals in the field discuss their viewpoints on conducting and publishing integrative science.
