-
Immunity in the Mind
Do our own prejudices and perceptions of people help defend our bodies against infectious disease? An article published in the April issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, suggests that our brains contain a sort of "behavioral immune system" that defends against disease even before disease-causing pathogens reach our bodies. Mark Schaller, of the University of British Columbia, who co-authored the article with Justin H.
-
El poder encamina a la infidelidad
El Colombiano: Ellos lo son, lo ha reconocido la sociedad. Pero ¿y de ellas qué? Infidelidad. Que los unos y las otras lo sean... hoy no parece raro. ¿Qué los motiva? El poder juega. Un detonante a la luz de un nuevo estudio en Psychological Science , journal de la Association for Psychological Science. Mujeres poderosas también les hacen trampa a sus parejas, aunque los medios periodísticos se ocupen solo de políticos, deportistas o empresarios que son pillados.
-
Monkeys show ability to remember things
The Washington Post: Monkey see, monkey recall – at least for a couple of minutes. Ben Basile of Emory University in Atlanta placed five rhesus monkeys in front of a touchscreen that briefly showed a blue square and two red ones. After an interval of up to two minutes, the blue square reappeared in a different place, and the monkeys were prompted to replicate the pattern in its new position by tapping the screen to place red squares. Their success rate was significantly better than chance, showing for the first time that they are able to recall things from recent memory. This is more advanced than recognizing a familiar object, and it could be a precursor to long-term memory.
-
On 9/11, Americans may not have been as angry as you thought they were
On September 11, 2001, the air was sizzling with anger—and the anger got hotter as the hours passed. That, anyway, was one finding of a 2010 analysis by Mitja Back, Albrecht Küfner, and Boris Egloff of 85,000 pager messages sent that day. The researchers employed a commonly used tool called Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, or LIWC, which teases out information from the frequency of word usages in texts. But were Americans really so angry? Clemson University psychologist Cynthia L. S. Pury wasn’t out to answer this question when she made the discovery that was just published online in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
-
Gesünder leben
Shweizer Familie: Die Hand greift morgens wieder einmal zum Buttergipfeli anstatt zum Dinkelbrötchen. Mittags in der Kantine duftet die Bratwurst mit Zwiebelsauce einfach besser als der Zander auf Spinat. Mit dem Lift geht es zurück in den dritten Stock, obwohl man sich vorgenommen hatte, die Treppe zu nehmen. Und das Joggen nach der Arbeit fällt flach, weil der Kollege spontan zu einem Feierabendbier einlädt. Die meisten Menschen wissen, wie man schlank bleibt und sich vor Volkskrankheiten wie Bluthochdruck, Schlaganfall oder Diabetes schützt: weniger Zucker und Fett essen, fünf Portionen Früchte und Gemüse am Tag, Vollkornbrot statt Weissbrot, Wasser statt Cola – und genügend Bewegung.
-
Study links willingness to cheat, viewpoint on God
Los Angeles Times: A new study on the link between one's view of God and willingness to cheat on a test is the latest example of social scientists wading into the highly charged field of religion and morality. The study, titled "Mean Gods Make Good People: Different Views of God Predict Cheating Behavior" was peer reviewed and published earlier this month in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. In line with many previous studies, it found no difference between the ethical behavior of believers and nonbelievers. But those who believed in a loving, compassionate God were more likely to cheat than those who believed in an angry, punitive God.
