New Research From Psychological Science
Read about the latest research published in Psychological Science:
An Enhanced Default Approach Bias Following Amygdala Lesions in Humans
Laura A. Harrison, Rene Hurlemann, and Ralph Adolphs
Monkeys that have amygdala lesions — a part of the brain involved in memory, emotion, and learning — show a tendency to approach stimuli that are normally considered threatening. The researchers examined whether amygdala lesions produce a general default bias to evaluate stimuli positively or a specific positivity bias — in this case, a face-approach bias. They asked control subjects and three subjects with rare bilateral amygdala damage to indicate the degree to which they found pictures of people with or without occluded central facial features trustworthy or threatening. Participants with amygdala damage had a greater tendency than did control participants to rate occluded faces as more approachable than whole faces. This suggests that amygdala legions lead to a general default bias to evaluate stimuli positively.
Essentialism and Racial Bias Jointly Contribute to the Categorization of Multiracial Individuals
Arnold K. Ho, Steven O. Roberts, and Susan A. Gelman
Individuals of mixed Black and White descent are often characterized as being Black — a categorization bias known as hypodescent. In an examination of the factors influencing hypodescent, White adults were assessed for bias toward Whites or Blacks. Three weeks later, participants read an article indicating that race was genetically determined or that race had no genetic basis (a manipulation of perception of racial essentialism) before completing a task in which they categorized images of people as being White, Black, or Black-White multiracial. Racial essentialism had no impact on face categorization for participants low in intergroup bias, but it was related to increased classification of biracial individuals as Black for those high in intergroup bias. This finding sheds light on the way that motivational and cognitive biases lead to categorization bias.
APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.
Please login with your APS account to comment.