-
A More Mature Approach to Credibility Is Needed to Build Trust in Science
In this interview, Brian Nosek touches on big takeaways from the SCORE program, how evidence from the program contradicts the 2025 executive order, and his vision for a more trustworthy scientific landscape.
-
International Team Constructs Definition, Inventory of Questionable Research Practices
An international team of researchers has proposed an overall definition of QRPs and published a comprehensive list of them—as well as ways to detect and prevent them.
-
How Psychological Study Results Have Changed Since the Replication Crisis Began
A meta-analysis examines the progress scientific psychology has made in strengthening its practices and results.
-
Ensuring Research Validity: A Checklist for Stronger Science
Scientific credibility depends on valid research. But with growing concerns about replication failures and questionable research practices, how can scientists ensure their findings stand up to scrutiny? Under the Cortex explores.
-
New Content From Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
A sample of articles on preprocessing experience-sampling-method data, noise versus signal, validity and transparency in quantifying data, and much more.
-
Powerful Myths: Common Misconceptions About Statistical Power
Lukas Lengersdorff and Claus Lamm discuss three misconceptions that stand in the way of an informed discussion.
